Transcript of this video:
The Evils Of Psychiatry Truth About Bipolar,Depression, Abuse, DSM
00:02
life can be a real adventure hot fast
00:05
slower sad maybe sometimes even filled
00:08
with ups and downs but according to
00:10
psychiatrists any part of life can be
00:12
labeled a mental illness really like
00:14
what let's say you're upset after a bad
00:16
breakup well that could be labeled
00:18
depression what if you're nervous before
00:21
speaking in public anxiety disorder or
00:23
being really talkative and super active
00:25
manic that sounds a little crazy
00:28
it does but how much does this really
00:30
happen let's go ask how many people do
00:33
you know that I've been diagnosed with a
00:36
mental disorder diagnosed with a mental
00:39
that got off the top of my head maybe
00:42
one person that I know who's been
00:44
diagnosed with a mental disorder
00:46
probably just one so yeah maybe two or
00:49
three people maybe in the three or four
00:50
range or four or five maybe five six
00:53
people in the household six seven ten
00:56
dozen or so about 20 but 30 would
00:58
definitely be in the hundreds in short
01:00
the total number of people that I know
01:01
in mind and my lifetime has been
01:04
diagnosed with a mental disorder
01:04
probably all around the range of 100 to
01:08
150 and I'm 23 years old
01:11
Wow where are these disorders all coming
01:15
from from psychiatry's Diagnostic and
01:17
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
01:18
its 943 pages long and covers everything
01:23
from depression and anxiety to
01:25
stuttering cigarette addiction fear of
01:27
spiders nightmares problems with math
01:30
and even disorder of infancy all
01:33
reinterpreted and many falsely labeled
01:35
as a brain disease but people do have
01:38
serious problems in life absolutely
01:40
but psychiatrists reduce them down to
01:42
something wrong with your brain so let
01:44
me get this straight
01:45
psychiatrists have a book of life
01:46
problems reinterpreted as mental
01:49
disorders that's right Wow then it must
01:51
be backed up by a lot of science you
01:53
think so but it isn't psychiatrists at
01:55
one of their recent conventions admitted
01:57
to it
01:58
listen to this the SM is made up by
02:00
Committees of men who have political
02:03
opinion and women too who have biases
02:05
and political opinions and so there
02:09
isn't nearly as much science in DSM as
02:12
there ought to be like in the previous
02:13
one people had a meeting in the bathroom
02:14
and they decided that something should
02:15
be in there and then they would go and
02:17
propose it to the whole committee have
02:18
this kind of lumping together several of
02:22
several observations and when you get
02:24
enough of them in one tent you got a
02:27
diagnosis DSM system it's not your real
02:31
system of diagnosis a lot of the
02:33
disorders that are in there haven't
02:35
necessarily been rigorously validated
02:37
it's just the best tool that we have
02:38
available but it is not perfect it's so
02:42
useless that if you give me a patient
02:44
and the DSM I'll make at least 20
02:50
diagnosis on the same patient you have
02:52
to take it with a grain
02:55
it's actually getting more and more
02:56
complicated we're left with diagnosing
02:59
things in the basis of checklists and
03:01
questionnaires which leaves us sort of
03:03
out of as you said the rest of Medicine
03:05
because we don't have a biological test
03:09
amazing the lack of science in the dsm
03:12
is actually an open secret here's what
03:15
some professionals have to say about it
03:17
the DSM is a sham it's been described as
03:22
a house of cards why because the
03:25
diagnoses are theoretical they're not
03:28
based on scientific measurements it's
03:31
sort of a shaky level built on another
03:33
shaky level built on another shaky level
03:35
it is flimsy and that it is easily
03:39
collapsible under the scrutiny of
03:42
critical thinking if you just pull one
03:45
little fragment of the reasoning aside
03:48
and questioning thoroughly you'll find
03:50
it doesn't stand up and then that means
03:52
that the whole organism collapses
03:53
because you've got some wrong premises
03:55
in there somewhere and that they're all
03:57
over the person it is indeed house of
03:59
cards because it's predicated on not a
04:02
solid structure it is built to create an
04:05
apparently legitimate edifice which
04:08
results in a diagnosis but any serious
04:11
inquiry
04:12
was shown to be eligible now in school
04:15
authorities tell a mother as you already
04:17
heard that her son is sick and needs to
04:19
be on drugs how in the world is she to
04:22
know that that is simply alive how is
04:27
she to recognize that what experts now
04:30
call attention deficit hyperactivity
04:32
disorder is simply not a disease now
04:36
such a mother is not an expert in the
04:40
history of psychiatry she does not know
04:43
that psychiatrists have for hundreds of
04:47
years use diagnostic terms so called
04:50
diagnostic terms to stigmatize and
04:53
control people I will only give you a
04:56
few dramatic examples when black slaves
05:00
in the South ran away to freedom it
05:04
wasn't that they wanted to be free they
05:07
suffered from a disease called Repetto
05:09
mania from droopy tees Rena be slave in
05:15
mania I'm not being easy surplice was a
05:17
legitimate diagnosis just like attention
05:19
deficit disorder is women have sure
05:26
population of mankind of course if they
05:30
were foolish enough to rebel against
05:31
domination by men but then they had a
05:34
serious disease called hysteria which
05:37
was due to their wandering room now none
05:40
of those behaviors was ever a disease
05:43
and of course it's not a disease but
05:47
note is attention deficit disorder a
05:49
disease no behavior or misbehavior is a
05:53
disease or can be a disease that's not
05:57
what diseases are so it doesn't matter
06:00
how a child behaves there is nothing to
06:03
examine if he is sick then there must be
06:08
some objective science to it which can
06:12
be diagnosed by physicians and objective
06:15
tests it's very as soon as you go to a
06:17
doctors they take a lot of blood and
06:19
take x-rays they don't want to hear how
06:21
you behave when I'm into medical school
06:25
sixty years ago they were only a handful
06:28
of mental diseases I think there were no
06:30
more than six or seven now there are
06:33
more than 300 and new ones are quotes
06:36
discovered every day labeling a child as
06:39
mentally ill is stigmatization not
06:43
diagnosis giving a child a psychiatric
06:47
drug is poisoning not treatment diseases
06:52
are malfunctions of the human body of
06:54
the heart the liver the kidneys the
06:57
brain and so forth typhoid fever is a
07:02
disease you will know that you don't
07:05
question that spring fever
07:16
what you have to know is English spring
07:20
fever is not a disease now why not
07:24
because we all know that it's a figure
07:26
of speech
07:27
a metaphor a little piece of poetry now
07:32
so our all mental disease this mental
07:34
disease is a metaphor the task we set
07:38
ourselves to combat psychiatric coercion
07:41
is important I think it's important you
07:44
think it's important not enough people
07:46
think it's important it's a noble task a
07:50
task in the pursuit of which we must
07:53
regardless or obstacles persevere our
07:57
conscience commands that we do knowledge
08:01
said to a psychiatrist who saw me again
08:07
for maybe about 15 minutes
08:09
talked to me how I was doing at seven
08:10
years old and I left with the
08:13
prescription for Ritalin
08:14
probably within the first 15 minutes he
08:16
diagnosed me with having anxiety
08:17
disorder and put me on prescription
08:20
medication the amount of time it took
08:21
for the diagnosis was I'd say probably
08:23
within 10 minutes is you know I was
08:26
diagnosed with anxiety with depression
08:27
within 10 minutes of speaking to the
08:29
psychiatrist and I was put on those
08:31
drugs immediately I received numerous
08:33
different diagnoses
08:37
different doctors and each one gave me a
08:39
different drug I didn't have to undergo
08:41
any tests I didn't even have to sit
08:43
there and I did enough to ask any
08:45
questions it was just that's that's what
08:47
got and this is the drug they really
08:50
didn't talk to me they were always
08:52
talking and questioning my mother it was
08:55
all about getting the information from
08:57
her and not from me it don't make sense
09:00
to me I researched it I've done my
09:02
research and I still can't fully
09:04
understand how you can diagnose somebody
09:07
with a short attention span there was
09:10
never an explanation nobody really knew
09:12
what it was or why it was caused or how
09:16
did you get it
09:16
why did anybody have it and what could
09:19
anybody do about it you know just here
09:21
have some medicine and going and I was
09:23
put on I mean a horses dose of an
09:27
antidepressant called effectual 450
09:30
milligrams a day I mean they say if your
09:33
own 300 year comatose it wasn't always
09:35
readily it was went from ritalin to like
09:39
well you trying to concerta
09:41
to adderall I remember asking these
09:43
doctors is there any other way we can do
09:45
this is there any other therapy is there
09:47
something we can do that won't make me
09:48
feel so badly that won't give me all
09:51
these side effects and and just horrible
09:53
sensations to my body 24 hours a day is
09:56
there something else I can do that might
09:57
be not having to do with medications
09:59
doctor said no see what you have is very
10:02
complex you have a chemical and balance
10:05
in your brain that the only thing that
10:07
can correct it is medication
10:10
Wow lots of diagnosis but all you seem
10:13
to get his meds
10:14
no the disorder in the classification
10:16
does not require that there be knowledge
10:19
about its etiology so in other words to
10:21
make a diagnosis you really don't need
10:24
to bother with cause and effect you
10:27
don't need to know what causes the
10:29
condition wait a minute
10:31
if the DSM doesn't tell you what causes
10:33
its mental disorders how does
10:35
psychiatrists discover them in the first
10:37
place the answer may surprise you
10:39
new diseases are being invented all the
10:42
time and I want to emphasize the word
10:44
invented because when it comes to
10:46
psychiatry mental illnesses are not
10:49
discovered they're invented the way the
10:53
system works in terms of diagnosis is
10:55
that every few years a group of
10:57
psychiatrists and psychologists sit
10:59
around in a room and vote on new
11:01
diagnoses this is science
11:04
I can't believe it don't worry you're
11:06
not alone these are voted on
11:10
what do you mean did you say are they
11:13
voted into existence voted as in
11:15
creative oh yeah I think that's kind of
11:18
ridiculous it's crazy that you would
11:20
vote I definitely don't agree I don't
11:22
agree with it at all mental disorders
11:24
should be based on scientific research I
11:26
have been led to believe that it's all
11:28
based on medicine and science so I'm
11:30
kind of shocked to find that out me too
11:33
there's more not only our mental
11:36
disorders voted into the DSM but now and
11:39
then they are also voted out
11:41
take for example homosexuality listed in
11:44
DSM's 1 & 2 as a mental illness this is
11:48
how the editor-in-chief of the DSM 3
11:50
Robert Spitzer explained it I came up
11:54
with the definition in 1973 that made it
11:57
possible to argue that homosexuality was
12:00
not a mental disorder on a vote
12:03
essentially at a conference of the
12:06
American Psychiatric Association it was
12:08
removed now did they discover that
12:12
homosexuality was not a disease through
12:15
scientific processes no it was included
12:19
for political reasons and it was removed
12:22
for political reasons and the end result
12:25
is a has a vote it's done it's a
12:28
supposed democracy so to call it science
12:31
is is a complete fabrication so the DSM
12:35
is actually political not scientific
12:37
right
12:48
I thought psychiatrists wanted to be
12:50
seen as doctors you're right that's why
12:52
they had to make their manual look much
12:54
more scientific which it wasn't so what
12:57
did they do that well they decided the
12:59
DSM next edition was going to be
13:00
completely different it was a decision
13:03
that would change psychiatry forever if
13:07
you roll a clock forward to the 1970s in
13:10
the United States basically that time
13:13
psychiatry was in very poor shape for a
13:16
number of reasons first of all it was
13:18
helping very low regard by other members
13:20
of the medical profession
13:21
so socotra was the sort of thing you did
13:24
if you couldn't succeed in any other
13:26
area of Medicine and people such as
13:28
Robert Spitzer in America made it very
13:31
clear the time had come essentially for
13:34
psychiatrists being doctors of Medicine
13:37
to practice medicine so if the
13:41
psychiatrist was spending a lot of time
13:42
dealing with people who were anxious
13:46
depressed these dilemmas these problems
13:50
in living now essentially had to be
13:53
redefined and they were really found as
13:57
medical conditions the solution to this
13:59
was to come up with a manual which
14:01
defined psychiatric disorders more
14:04
carefully so hence we have DSM 3 which
14:09
is the third edition which is published
14:11
in 1980 under spitzer psychiatrist
14:14
editing the dsm 3 through out Freudian
14:16
psychology and decreed that from now on
14:19
psychiatry's diagnoses were purely
14:21
biological so they finally became
14:24
scientific no actually not at all in
14:27
fact the political bickering over what
14:30
disorders to put in and what to leave
14:32
out of the DSM 3 was even more
14:34
ridiculous here's what one psychiatrist
14:36
had to say about it
14:38
would squeeze into a room which is about
14:41
half the size of this one was much too
14:42
small and Bob would raise a provocative
14:46
question and people would shout out
14:50
their opinions from all sides of the
14:52
room and whoever shouted loudest tended
14:55
to be heard my own impression is more
14:58
like a tobacco auction than the sort of
15:02
conference and this is what another
15:04
member of the DSM decision-making panel
15:06
said the low level of intellectual
15:09
effort was shocking diagnosis were
15:11
developed by majority vote on the level
15:13
we would use to choose a restaurant you
15:16
feel like Italian I feel like Chinese so
15:18
let's go to a cafeteria then it's typed
15:21
into the computer it may replace it our
15:23
naivete but it was our belief that there
15:25
would be an attempt to look at things
15:27
scientifically sounds like they had a
15:31
diagnostic manual that looked more
15:32
scientific but had no more science in it
15:35
than before meanwhile the number of
15:37
mental disorders in the DSM 3 had
15:39
ballooned to 259 but to sell the idea
15:43
that psychiatry was a true medical
15:45
science they had to spin it with a
15:47
really impressive scientific sounding
15:49
theory but with DSM 3 from 1980 on there
15:53
was the progressive medicalization of
15:55
psychiatry
15:57
and the notion of chemical imbalance was
15:59
invented and essentially took hold well
16:02
chemical what chemical imbalance theory
16:05
it was first suggested in 1965 to try to
16:08
explain how depression might be caused
16:10
by an imbalance of certain brain
16:12
chemicals I'd like to hear this Joseph
16:15
shield kraut theorized that because
16:17
psychiatric drugs alter the levels of
16:19
some of these chemicals then mental
16:21
illness must be caused by too much or
16:23
too little of them isn't that backwards
16:26
it sure is it's a little like saying
16:28
that because aspirin stops a headache
16:29
that headaches are caused by the
16:31
deficiency of aspirin I see what you
16:33
mean
16:34
but it was just convincing enough to
16:36
give psychiatry and the DSM 3 the
16:39
superficial aura of science as Robert
16:42
Spitzer put it cigar be felt now cheaper
16:46
more scientific were part of medicine so
16:49
it worked yes and ever since then
16:52
psychiatrists and the pharmaceutical
16:54
industry have relentlessly promoted this
16:57
chemical imbalance theory both to the
16:59
medical field and the public if you are
17:02
one of the millions of people who live
17:03
with uncontrollable worry anxiety and
17:05
several of these symptoms for six months
17:07
or more you could be suffering from
17:08
generalized anxiety disorder and two
17:10
chemical imbalance could be to blame
17:12
pristiq is thought to work by affecting
17:14
the levels of two chemicals in the brain
17:16
it works to correct chemical imbalances
17:18
in the brain which may be related to
17:19
symptoms of social anxiety disorder
17:21
cymbalta works on serotonin and
17:24
norepinephrine hundreds of thousands of
17:26
patients have been prescribed abilify
17:27
ask your doctor if your doctor talk to
17:30
your doctor call your doctor ask your
17:32
about cymbalta pristiq is a key in
17:34
helping to treat my depression ask your
17:36
doctor about pristiq you come to my
17:40
office and I say to you well you you
17:43
describe what's going on in your life
17:44
and and your symptoms and I said well
17:46
it's clear to me that you've got a
17:46
chemical imbalance and we're going to
17:48
write you a prescription for this the
17:49
truth of the matter is there's no such
17:51
thing as a chemical imbalance there's no
17:53
test out there that they can depend on
17:56
that tells you you have a chemical
17:57
imbalance there's actually in fact
17:59
dozens of studies showing that there
18:02
isn't any measurable imbalance so
18:05
psychiatrists will explain to patients
18:07
all the time this is just like diabetes
18:09
and diabetes you have low insulin we
18:12
have to readjust the insulin level in
18:13
depression you have low serotonin we
18:16
have to readjust the serotonin level but
18:19
actually we have already proven that
18:20
there's nothing wrong with serotonin
18:22
levels it's completely a myth disproven
18:25
by our own evidence okay if we apply
18:27
these labels what next and the what next
18:31
tends to be you get a prescription and
18:33
the prescription is for a drug that
18:34
doesn't work very well and is toxic it's
18:36
like a one-two punch the the number one
18:39
of the one-two punch is the diagnostic
18:42
manual you've got all these disorders to
18:44
choose from that the two is the
18:46
treatment so you've got the diagnostic
18:48
manual in place you've got a machinery
18:50
in place and then you've got this
18:52
treatment that is there for the taking
18:55
for everything you can think of that
18:58
might seem to be odd behavior the
19:01
psychiatry field has a name for it and
19:04
then for every name of every diagnosis
19:07
you have there's gonna be pharmacology
19:09
behind it and they have a pill for it
19:12
let me fan it out and pick a card and
19:14
there you go
19:15
here's your label and there's the drug
19:17
give you to go along with that label 98%
19:20
maybe 99% of people will get a diagnosis
19:23
that justifies the use of a medication
19:25
and also a follow-up appointment because
19:29
remember the the business of medicine
19:33
the business of psychiatry is seeing
19:34
patients and the psychiatrist that tells
19:37
a patient they don't have a problem and
19:39
there's no medicine for that problem
19:41
doesn't have a very busy practice and
19:44
that's sort of the purpose of the DSC in
19:45
three four five to provide a diagnosis
19:49
that can be given a drug for their
19:51
patient it's a quick buck you don't need
19:54
to do a physical exam you put it in the
19:57
chart it's done prescribe away lifetime
20:01
patient
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar